RvS: What is Essential for Offline RL via Supervised Learning?
Scott Emmons, University of California, Berkeley
Recent work has shown that supervised learning alone, without temporal difference (TD) learning, can be remarkably effective for offline RL. When does this hold true, and which algorithmic components are necessary? Through extensive experiments, we boil supervised learning for offline RL down to its essential elements. In every environment suite we consider, simply maximizing likelihood with a two-layer feedforward MLP is competitive with state-of-the-art results of substantially more complex methods based on TD learning or sequence modeling with Transformers. Carefully choosing model capacity (e.g., via regularization or architecture) and choosing which information to condition on (e.g., goals or rewards) are critical for performance. These insights serve as a field guide for practitioners doing Reinforcement Learning via Supervised Learning (which we coin RvS learning). They also probe the limits of existing RvS methods, which are comparatively weak on random data, and suggest a number of open problems.
Authors: Scott Emmons1, Benjamin Eysenbach2, Ilya Kostrikov1, Sergey Levine1
1University of California, Berkley, USA
2Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Abstract Author(s): (see above authors)