Next: Solution Using Maple
Up: Finite Length Wire
Previous: Finite Length Wire
Formulation of the Discrete Model
We begin our discussion by exploring a discrete model which is used to formulate
the expression describing the potential at
P(x,y),
due to the 1-D charged wire.
Let's assume that the interval
[-1, 1]
is subdivided into 2n equally sized segments:
(n segments
below the origin and n above). Note that the width of each
subinterval is
,
since the length of the wire is l = 2 units.
For the sake of consistency with the remaining presentation of this module,
we select a charge density function of the form:
(power dependence position law).
Without loss of generality, we select k=1 and
we define our task to be the calculation of the scaled potential
at the point
P(1/2,1/2).
Focusing on the ith subinterval
(of width
),
the distance between one of its endpoints and the origin is
.
Also, the distance r between the points
P(1/2,1/2)
and
is given by:
The total scaled potential at
P(1/2,1/2)
is obtained by superimposing the potentials from all segments of length
along the wire.
Thus an approximation for
Vs(1/2,1/2)
can be expressed by :

It is evident that, in order to obtain a more "accurate" numeric
value for
Vs(1/2,1/2)
we must use finer partitions for the interval
[-1, 1].
Extending this process to the limiting case, we must examine the situation
where
(i.e., the width of each
subinterval tends to zero), and try to calculate the previous sum as
n tends to infinity. Such calculations are tedious to be done
by hand and so a computer algebra system should be invoked. You may wish to
use Maple or Mathematica.
Next: Solution Using Maple
Up: Finite Length Wire
Previous: Finite Length Wire
Ignatios Vakalis